Preparation of Literature Review

An imperfect literature review can literally hamper a dissertation. Since literature reviews are the basic step in investigation, Imperfection leads to many mistakes because unless the investigator has a basic knowledge of the literature, one cannot proceed further in his research (Boote & Beile, 2005).

When assessors start appraising a dissertation they expect it to qualify, but when they come across an imperfect literature review, they are sure that the remainder of the dissertation will eventually be flawed according to Mullins and Kiley, dissertation examiners from Australia in 2002.

When they come across an imperfect literature review, the assessors start looking at the information collection techniques, the scrutiny, and the ending with precision according to Boote & Beile.

The spot light

The spot light of the review is the first attribute. According to Cooper, There are 4 prospective spotlights:

1. Research results
2. Research Techniques
3. Hypothesis
4. Functional purpose

When the review is based on Research results, it is a widespread issue. Data Scrutiny and fusion, which centers on Research results and not references or quotes and deriving results from it is defined as a literature review by the ERIC-Educational Resources Information Center. ERIC further states that a result oriented review often aids in recognizing if any data is deficient for a particular research result while building up a research basis.

Cooper’s   second prospective spotlight is research results where technical reviews are given prominence.

The research techniques in a particular area are probed upon to recognize important determinants, procedures and scrutiny methods to make known result oriented investigation in a Procedural review.

Also Procedural review is of utmost importance in recognizing procedural strong points and limitations in a research structure and investigate how research application aids in literature review.

Sometimes it is possible to determine the application of a solution or learn the mode of operation of people through a review.

When viewed in terms of a research basis, the 4^th review aids in setting up an actual necessity.

Evaluating a Literature Review

There is a five-class rubric for assessing literature review designed by Bootes and Beile.

• Exposure
• Fusion
• Strategy adopted
• Importance
• Style

Analyzing the Data

The research data is summed up and scrutinized in the fourth chapter of the thesis with least possible analysis. The actual information can be cross checked by the readers enabling them to arrive at an understanding in respect to chapter 5. The review starts with a concise description of the study and the research technique applied. Chapter 4 must be in close relation with respect to the leading queries or theory spoken about in the thesis earlier. The queries and theories can be aptly fit in the headlines where results pertaining to the queries are shown. Analyzing the collected data provides a deeper understanding of the topic in a dissertation bringing you to your Conclusion chapter. Conclusions must be shown in easiest way possible (like easy illustrative portrayals, easy calculations of occurrence, and illustrative quantitative techniques) and afterwards in compound ways like multi-featured dealings and widespread models or deductive quantitative techniques (Drowns, n.d.). 

Get a professional dissertation writer.

Visit: http://www.DissertationDeal.com